- The environment
- The deficit
- Civil liberties
- Poor execution of a war fought on dubious premises
- Corporatism
Addendum photo: You are not alone! Fafblog feels your pain.
|
|
|||||||
Bush proved it
by
praktike
at 02:39PM (EST) on November 4, 2004 | Permanent Link
The following issues did not matter from an electoral perspective:
Addendum photo: You are not alone! Fafblog feels your pain.
Comments
Re: Bush proved it
by
stuzzy
on Thu 04 Nov 2004 04:15 PM EST | Profile | Permanent Link
tolerance and compassion
Re: Bush proved it
by
fling93
on Thu 04 Nov 2004 04:44 PM EST | Profile | Permanent Link
Pragmatism and tangible results.
Re: Bush proved it -- Q?
by
nadezhda
on Thu 04 Nov 2004 11:54 PM EST | Profile | Permanent Link
Curious what you're referring to by "corporatism"
ah, sorry
by
praktike
on Fri 05 Nov 2004 07:47 AM EST | Profile | Permanent Link
Sorry, maybe I made up that term. Think of it as governing for the benefit of corporate interests rather than the public interest.
Re: Bush proved it
by
Oscar
on Fri 05 Nov 2004 04:18 PM EST | Profile | Permanent Link
Well Bush and the previous commenters seem to have proven that what did not count electorially this time was "internationalist progressive cant". I did find the " pragmatism" suggestion of fling93 rather odd: since what Bush did worked, it might have been VERY pragmatic on his part.
true
by
praktike
on Fri 05 Nov 2004 04:44 PM EST | Profile | Permanent Link
"internationalist progressive cant" is a big loser. I always thought Kerry was too enamoured of it. But I think Fling was talking economics.
Re: true
by
fling93
on Fri 05 Nov 2004 07:02 PM EST | Profile | Permanent Link
I mean his policies, not his campaign strategy. Not just the economic ones, although those are probably the ones I've looked at more closely. But going after the hearts and minds of Muslims worldwide and allowing Abu Ghraib? Trying to nationbuild but dismantling the Iraqi security forces and not putting enough troops on the ground? Talking up free trade while raising tariffs? Talking up SS reform while squandering the surplus that would've been needed for the transition costs? Passing a Medicare bill that's just going to skyrocket costs by making prescription drugs an entitlement? Talking about WMDs and invading a country that didn't even have it's own nuclear program while doing absolutely nothing about two countries that did?
And all of which were argued against by his own advisors. Seems like a guy who is unusually indifferent to the actual results of his policies. Trackbacks
TrackBack URL: |
Recent Articles
Great minds and all thatThis Turkey Won't Fly One picture says it all Obama's exercise in rhetoric Obama Grand Tour and McCain Circus Roundup Biden has Obama's Afghan back = update - and the Pentagon too Bush's Pakistan-Afghanistan-Iran "legacy" - updated Then WTF is a "bail-out"? Blogging making reporters more relevant Ignatius and Zakaria - new WaPo joint venture Reasserting US Hegemony: Russian rollback, Chinese containment and Iranian regime change What's up A "paddling" of lame ducks? Voices of the New Arab Public Time for a post-post-9/11 world? Blake Hounshell (aka praktike), our co-founder and main man, is now web editor of Foreign Policy. blakehounshell [at] gmail Blake's personal blog
The Satin Pajama
NOMINEE Best non-Euro Blog
The first afoe European weblog awardsSponsored by A Fistful of Euros Hey, we didn't win, but we almost beat out the Head Heeb for 2nd place! Thanks for the votes Click here for a really slick page of results and links to all the nominees in 18 different categories -- some wonderful blogs to explore, so check them out! Search
Month Archive
Login
|
||||||
|
|
|||||||