MC MasterChef's post on modernity and terrorism spun off an entire tangent about comparative religion as an area of knowledge, and how part of solving some of our conflicts will involve being open to learning about the "other" or the "alien". The discussion has been asking why this is especially a challenge in the field of religion, and some of the areas where greater learning should be promoted.
The topic is getting increasingly long and complex, so I thought moving it to the front page might help. The main part of the conversation starts here between Oscar and me.
This post responds to ideas Bondra presented about the frequent tension between personal faith and knowledge about other religions.
It is also a very belated attempt to respond to some of the observations JC made last week, responding to MC MasterChef's Christianism post, about the tensions between the personal and political in religious experience and matters of faith.
When we deal with faith or religiosity at the individual level, rather than at the level of a religion's theology, institutions, history, etc. there are clearly a bunch of factors that come into play. Here are a few observations tossed out. Not as well organized as I'd like, but you'll get the drift.
One of the big problems we've had with this whole post-election brouhaha is that nobody pays attention to level-of-analysis. Here we're dealing with indvidual voting decisions and trying to claim causality from an institutional affiliation, where we keep focusing on personal attitudes on one topic (religion) being extended to other topics (abortion, gay marriage, etc) and we're paying less attention to the institutional affiliation aspects.
By that I mean that we don't know what the actual beliefs are of a voter who "belongs" to a specific denomination, who "regularly practices" the religion (which we measure by the proxy of church attendance), how strongly those beliefs are held, the degree to which the beliefs are internal (related to the experience of faith) or external (related to membership or loyalty to group), and so on and so on. more »
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Recent Articles
Great minds and all thatnadezhda (0)   Sep 21 This Turkey Won't Fly nadezhda (2)   Sep 21 One picture says it all nadezhda (0)   Aug 8 Obama's exercise in rhetoric nadezhda (0)   Jul 24 Obama Grand Tour and McCain Circus Roundup nadezhda (1)   Jul 21 Biden has Obama's Afghan back = update - and the Pentagon too nadezhda (0)   Jul 17 Bush's Pakistan-Afghanistan-Iran "legacy" - updated nadezhda (0)   Jul 17 Then WTF is a "bail-out"? nadezhda (1)   Jul 16 Blogging making reporters more relevant nadezhda (0)   Jun 18 Ignatius and Zakaria - new WaPo joint venture nadezhda (1)   Jun 16 Reasserting US Hegemony: Russian rollback, Chinese containment and Iranian regime change nadezhda (0)   May 8 What's up nadezhda (0)   Apr 22 A "paddling" of lame ducks? nadezhda (0)   Apr 22 Voices of the New Arab Public nadezhda (0)   Dec 31 Time for a post-post-9/11 world? nadezhda (0)   Dec 21 Recent Comments
sandiego relaestate
Max123
sandiego relaestate
Max123
sandiego relaestate
Max123
Re: Out on a limb
quit smoking
Re: Ignatius and Zakaria - new WaPo joint venture
quit smoking
sandiego relaestate
Max123
sandiego relaestate
Max123
Search
Legal Eagles
Ivory Tower Pros
security minded
conversations
This Month
Month Archive
|
Friday, November 12
by
nadezhda
on Fri 12 Nov 2004 01:04 AM EST
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

