Stop and rest awhile as the caravan moves on
chez  Nadezhda is a space to share conversations, books, photos and resources on foreign affairs, national security, nation-building, rule of law, political economy, history, religions and beliefs, communication and cultures.
[Site under construction -- watch your step]
MC MasterChef's Kitchen - Topics
Recent Articles
Search
NetNews with a View
This Month
September 2004
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30
BlogHarbor Badge

powered by BlogHarbor



View Article  Debates
Ok, I promised a post on the talk last night from BU political science professors, historians, and my professor Bacevich on the upcoming election, but won't be able to write up anything detailed at the moment since I've spent all this evening 1) hearing a informational talk about careers in the State Department (which I'm not sure would be my top choice, but which I'm open to at this point) and 2) watching the debates.

I was going to take notes and maybe blog live while watching, but I decided to catch it with friends on cable instead of going to the university's big open presentation in the student union and so lost the chance to comment via wireless. I watched it on C-Span so I missed most of what I'm sure is yet another hurricane of spin descending on Florida at this moment that will continue throughout the week, but I might as well toss in a short reaction now before I try and quickly catch up on all the homework I've put off till this point in the evening. I don't own a tv at home myself and so miss out on a lot of the coverage of this campaign -- mostly I read about events and speeches, rather than hearing them live, which makes an obvious big difference in how I percieve the events.

This is the first time save the convention that I've heard Kerry speak extensively on tv and overall I think it was a reassuring experience; I found him measured, strong in his criticisms of the president and I think fairly effective at articulating himself.

That said, while Bush's repetition annoyed me at points and while there were one or two points where I just had to shake my head disbelievingly (I'll have to track down a transcript because I remember one part in particular where I felt Bush stumbled badly in trying to formulate an answer to one of Kerry's allegations -- but alas can't remember what that was, now without notes).

(Edit: Remembered. Bush's lamest attempt to respond to Kerry's criticisms I thought came when he gave a half-hearted jab back at Kerry's list of homeland security initiatives -- something about a "tax gap" and then kind of trailed off, not even bothering to take that anywhere. Circuitous answers come with the debates, but I thought Bush's performance on that particular question was particularly -- and visibly -- weak.)

I wouldn't call myself satisfied by the debate -- even as someone who will in all likelihood vote for Kerry come November, I'm not sure he has articulated a security strategy to counter Bush's own any more comprehensive than "I can do it better" (something I'm inclined to agree with and which should be as good a reason as any to vote for a change of administrations, I should note). The talk of expanding alliances is a nice goal, but I'm not necessarily sure it's a path to success -- but there is of course a limit on how much a challenger can promise without knowing what situation he will face upon taking office, anyways. Over-all I think both sides held up fairly well and reassured their respective partisans of their capabilities to carry out the office, but what took place in the eyes of these mythical undecided voters out there I have no way of imagining.

One thing off the top of my head that did bother me was the fact that Kerry failed to call out Bush on his plans for missile defense, a highly shaky plan in my mind that should be subjected to a lot more scrutiny than it's recieved thus far. Noahmax of Defense Tech (link found through praktike's blogroll -- interesting stuff there) has some thoughts and I've also written previously about some of the questions NMD raises.

There was much more raised in the speech, obviously, but it's late and I need to get some reading on the Civil War (as in, US Civil War) finished up before bed. Hopefully more over the weekend once I find a transcript and have more time to digest.

Edit: More on NMD here as well. I realize there's only so much time to rebut in a debate setting, but this is something that needs to be questioned.

Edit the second: Making the rounds before bed -- I'd say I agree with Jeralynn Meritt's reactions at Talk Left to the candidate's performance temperament-wise. I thought Bush, even when making what from his point of view may have been a decent rebuttal of Kerry's critiques, seemed, well, kinda exasperated throughout the whole thing. Kerry in contrast was pretty calm and confident throughout with only a few uncomfortable grins. Bush always seems to be talking to some particuarly slow seven-year old, but this time it was a seven-year old asking uncomfortable questions, and I think it showed with the repetitive answers (anyone who makes a drinking game for these had better put in a couple of shots for the phrase "hard work") and the somewhat testy responses even when trying to assert the strengths of his administration.


Also - the "flip-flopper" accusations pain me to no end, so I was happy to see Kerry give what to me was a pretty strong defense of his positions. I'd like to see this 87billion silliness nipped in the bud once and for all, which didn't happen, but "You can be certain and be wrong" -- that's good stuff.

View Article  Coming Attractions
Tonight I will be attending this event and will plan on bringing my laptop in hopes that there will be interesting things said worth blogging about. This Thursday, after attending an informational session on careers in the State Department, I'll also be watching the first debates, and might chime in along with everybody else and their brother with my reactions to that, either live via the magic of wi-fi or shortly afterwards. Also, my huge shipment of Islam in South Asia books from Amazon just arrived, so I have a lot of reading to get started on.
View Article  Trivia Time
Guess which state in the nation had the largest overall percentage increase in housing prices over the past 23 years?

Hint: It ain't Indiana.

   more »

View Article  "The CIA was not going to have its jihad run 'by some liberal arts jerkoff'"

Of all the classes I'm taking this year, I think my Islam in South Asia course has the potential to be the most interesting -- in part because it is all very much new frontiers for me personally in my studies, in part because of the increased profile of South and Central Asia in our post-9/11 security conceptions, and also in large part because of the professor himself. A former reporter in Afghanistan during the jihad (he briefly met bin Laden "back when he was nobody"), a former Pakistani ambassador to Sri Lanka, and an expert on political Islam in its various permutations, Professor Haqqani leavens his considerable personal experience (he's recently mentioned his friend former Pakistani Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto as a possible guest speaker at some point in class) by engaging readily with his students; a diplomat's skills at personability, no doubt.

In any case, my having come to the class already familiar with (and with plenty more questions about) the broad outlines of the Afghan conflict and the twin roles of Pakistan and the US in shaping the anti-Soviet jihad through having read Steve Coll's Ghost Wars has given me a bit of a rapport with him, but not so much that I wasn't rather startled when out of the blue in class last Thursday he asked me if I'd be willing to comb through the book for some quotes he would be using in a book he's working on. Well... sure, why not? I've certainly never been asked to be a research assistant before (if you could call it that) but hey, I'm not about to pass up the opportunity. So last weekend, borrowing his copy of the book (Amazon just delivered mine yesterday), I set about skimming over the pages again looking for quotes (which, having compiled and handed on to him last Monday, I've now got burning a hole in my hardrive waiting to be put to use in some blog posts; I've attached the complete list I found at the end of this post for others' use, and there are a lot of them -- the one in this post's title on page 166 definitely being my personal favorite) on the liasons between the US CIA and the Pakistani ISI and how the Americans were initially content to a great extent to sit back and allow the Pakistanis control where US money would be funnelled. This lax oversight of American money and materiel is a dominant theme in the early parts of Coll's book, -- having set the CIA to the goal of bleeding the Soviets, the Americans in Islamabad and Washington, D.C. left questions of who would be undertaking that task (and thus gaining training and support) and what kind of political future might follow to Pakistan's ISI and ruling junta under the political Islamist General Zia ul-Haq.    more »

1 Attachments
View Article  Syllabi
I'm taking four classes this semester, and thought I might as well post my collected reading lists for them in lieu of more detailed commentary at this time since it's getting on rather late. If there's an Amazon account you'd like me to link through, I'll go back and edit this entry tomorrow with the appropriate links, but for now here's the list...   more »
View Article  Salud
So after a very kind invitation on the part of Nadezhda and Praktike, I've joined Chez Nadezhda as an -- author? commentator? pundit? While publicly accesible blogging software has made it easy for just about anyone to appoint (or annoint) themselves these things, I don't know just how ready I am to take that step, or whether it would be especially wise of me to do so at this point in my intellectual development. Student would be much more apt -- since that's what I am, on this side of the monitor screen. Specifically, I major in international relations in Boston University's College of Arts and Sciences.. and barring any massive breakdowns between now and May, expect to graduate with a BA in said field at the end of this academic year. Within the IR department my "primary track" is Foreign Policy and Security Studies, and my "secondary track" East Asia -- which in practice has usually meant China, although my language studies since high school have had me studying Japanese, a bit of scholastic schizophrenia I'm meaning to correct by taking more courses on Japanese politics and Chinese language at some point in the future. Generally speaking, I dislike excessive regional specializiation if it can be avoided, since as an American in the 21st century I feel my perspective should necessarily be more global in scope. I look forward to the opportunity to share some of my educational process here, and hope it might prove as interesting to others as it does to me.   more »