I have three term papers coming due at the end of the next month and a half or so, all theoretically running at 10-15 pages each but which, depending on my ability to focus, may well end up sprawling past that nominal limit.
For my Islam in South Asia course, I have chosen to focus on Uighur separatism in China's western Xinjiang province. Muslim minority separatist groups in places like Chechnya have in the recent past successfully exploited their identity to appeal to a broader Pan-Islamic community, drawing in material, monetary, and ideological support as well as the occassional corps of foreign volunteers like the Arab Afghans of the 1980s; given the considerable efforts by Beijing to repress Uighur nationalism and the Han colonization campaign in the west, it's important to determine whether those small handfuls of Uighurs you always hear tacked onto the end of the list of Egyptians, Jordanians, and other Middle Eastern and South Asian militants captured or killed in the news reports are signs that Xinjiang might develop into the newest front of radical Islamic revivalism sometime in the near future.
For my China course, I'm planning on writing something on the danwei work unit system, with all the incorporated housing, educational, and social controls that come with employment in a state-owned factory unit; the basic focus of that will be the penetration of the CCP party-state apparatus into Chinese society and asking whether the CCP leadership can continue to effectively rule China without the use of such interventionist state organs to prop up their rule.
And for my Japanese Foreign Policy course, I'm trying to explain why the Self Defense Forces continue to operate under a system of such binding hadome ("brakes"), because frankly it just boggles my mind the kind of restrictions they place on their military forces. Did you know they can't even take part in land mine removal missions? I don't think they have to wait for a Diet resolution to return fire any more, but some of this stuff puts even the American aversion (that keeps repeating itself every other chapter in my American Military Experience course) to funding a standing war-fighting Army during times of peace to shame.
Right now for all this I have... an introduction for one of them and an outline for the other two, so if I'm not blogging much from now till early December, I trust you'll understand why. If I get any good excerpts while writing, I'll be sure to post them here, otherwise I'll put the whole things up when I can finally get them finished.
|
||||
|
Recent Articles
Great minds and all that
nadezhda (0)   Sep 21 This Turkey Won't Fly nadezhda (2)   Sep 21 One picture says it all nadezhda (0)   Aug 8 Obama's exercise in rhetoric nadezhda (0)   Jul 24 Obama Grand Tour and McCain Circus Roundup nadezhda (1)   Jul 21 Biden has Obama's Afghan back = update - and the Pentagon too nadezhda (0)   Jul 17 Bush's Pakistan-Afghanistan-Iran "legacy" - updated nadezhda (0)   Jul 17 Then WTF is a "bail-out"? nadezhda (1)   Jul 16 Blogging making reporters more relevant nadezhda (0)   Jun 18 Ignatius and Zakaria - new WaPo joint venture nadezhda (1)   Jun 16 Reasserting US Hegemony: Russian rollback, Chinese containment and Iranian regime change nadezhda (0)   May 8 What's up nadezhda (0)   Apr 22 A "paddling" of lame ducks? nadezhda (0)   Apr 22 Voices of the New Arab Public nadezhda (0)   Dec 31 Time for a post-post-9/11 world? nadezhda (0)   Dec 21 Recent Comments
sandiego relaestate
Max123
sandiego relaestate
Max123
sandiego relaestate
Max123
Re: Out on a limb
quit smoking
Re: Ignatius and Zakaria - new WaPo joint venture
quit smoking
sandiego relaestate
Max123
sandiego relaestate
Max123
Search
conversations
NetNews with a View
This Month
Month Archive
|
Saturday, October 30
by
MC MasterChef
on Sat 30 Oct 2004 04:35 PM EDT
Friday, October 22
by
MC MasterChef
on Fri 22 Oct 2004 06:04 PM EDT
I found the article I think I mentioned earlier by Professor Haqqani on the madrassa movement from an issue of Foreign Affairs; I'll share and reccomend it here as well.
In a basement room with plasterless walls adorned by a clock inscribed with "God is Great" in Arabic, 9-year-old Mohammed Tahir rocked back and forth and recited the same verse of the Koran that had been instilled into my memory at the same age: "Of all the communities raised among men you are the best, enjoining the good, forbidding the wrong, and believing in God." But when I asked him to explain how he understands the passage, Tahir's interpretation was quite different from the quietist version taught to me. "The Muslim community of believers is the best in the eyes of God, and we must make it the same in the eyes of men by force," he said. "We must fight the unbelievers and that includes those who carry Muslim names but have adopted the ways of unbelievers. When I grow up I intend to carry out jihad in every possible way." Tahir does not believe that al Qaeda is responsible for September 11 because his teachers have told him that the attacks were a conspiracy by Jews against the Taliban. He also considers Mullah Omar and Osama bin Laden great Muslims, "for challenging the might of the unbelievers." ... As I said in my comments on the Tactius thread (cross-posting my comments below) where I first excerpted this: we continue to ignore this at our own peril. Thursday, October 21
by
MC MasterChef
on Thu 21 Oct 2004 11:53 PM EDT
It only recently came out, so I hadn't been able to order a copy with the rest of my recent book orders, but Stephen Cohen's The Idea of Pakistan was one of the books recommended to me by Professor Haqqani at the start of my Islam in South Asia course. Seeing that Pervez Hoodbhoy has a major review of it in the current issue of Foreign Affairs (which I have just inadvertently found out I can read for free online when connecting through the university network.. sweet!) I've got hopes that I can successfully order a copy now and place it somewhere on my pile.
Ominous declarations of imminent chaos in Pakistan abound in the United States. Cohen aims both to raise warnings and to soothe fears.more » Tuesday, October 5
by
MC MasterChef
on Tue 05 Oct 2004 09:25 PM EDT
I'm not going to liveblog the debates, but I am watching them here at the moment now, and about five minutes into it Dick Cheney already has me yelling at the screen. I'm sorry, but IRAQ was not the "most likely nexus" (paraphrasing from memory here) of terrorist groups and nuclear weapons, because if I've learned anything in my Political Islam in South Asia course, that "most likely place for them to come together" was freaking PAKISTAN.
|
|||

